War:
A period of hostile relations between countries, states, or factions that leads to fighting between armed forces especially in land, air, or sea. That's not our definition either. What do you call the actions of Mexico's Military inside our borders and attacking our troops? Yeah, lets just wrap it up and make it peachy keen, and call it the war on drugs. This type of continual hostile actions by Mexico, goes beyond the cleverly fixed title, of war on drugs. Mexico is filled with corruption. They can't control their own Military, and they sure can't control their smugglers. We can't control our own borders or laws either, Mexico says so.
Mexican soldiers and civilian smugglers had an armed standoff with nearly 30 U.S. law enforcement officials on the Rio Grande in Texas Monday afternoon, according to Texas police and the FBI.
Mexican Army troops had several mounted machine guns on the ground more than 200 yards inside the U.S. border — near Neely’s Crossing, about 50 miles east of El Paso — when Border Patrol agents called for backup. Hudspeth County deputies and Texas Highway patrol officers arrived shortly afterward, Doyal said.
“It’s been so bred into everyone not to start an international incident with Mexico that it’s been going on for years,” Doyal said. “When you’re up against mounted machine guns, what can you do? Who wants to pull the trigger first? Certainly not us.” *snip*
Doyal said deputies captured one vehicle in the incident, a Cadillac Escalade reportedly stolen from El Paso, and found 1,477 pounds of marijuana inside. The Mexican soldiers set fire to one of the Humvees stuck in the river, he said.
Doyal’s deputies faced a similar incident on Nov. 17,
Hat tip Freedom Folks
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Sunday, September 16, 2007
MAYOR DALEY NO SPEAK ENGLISH CHICAGO TAXPAYER YOU PAY THEIR SALARY
Elderly not mentioned in this new city scam!
Were so tired of Daley's Safe Sanctuary policy, and now we have an even better reason to be thouroughly disgusted. The city and business head tax couldn't get it right the first time. So Daley has a new SPIN PLAN, and is going to throw us to the wolves in sheep clothing. Why we need to seriously consider getting out of Chicago, a city that is cemented literally in corruption of greed and votes for continual power.
You have to love our Mayor! We have a budget crisis and now he wants the taxpayer to pay salaries of the non-English speakers, just so they can have jobs? That is, jobs taken from American citizens. Or is it an issue, AS AN American citizen but never bothering to even learn the English language? How are they to serve in their jobs, without the ability to communicate in English, with all the English speaking people whom they may end up serving, communicating or coming into contact with?
$2 million remains unspent. And the concept of head tax relief has been jettisoned entirely -- in favor of a redesigned initiative with a better chance of success.
The program still is aimed at helping businesses and the unemployed but now involves paying half an employee's wages for the first 12 weeks on the job -- with a cap of $3,500 -- and only after those candidates have been screened and trained by some of the 27 different agencies operating under the "Worknet Chicago" umbrella.
Fifty-seven candidates are now in a 12-week trial in jobs with benefits that pay at least $9 an hour. All have "significant barriers to employment" because they are ex-offenders, public-housing residents, homeless, residents of high-poverty areas, people with disabilities or non-English speakers.
********************************************************************Mayor least we remind you, this is a needed requirement for citizenship!
The ability to read, write and speak ordinary English unless they are physically unable to do so due to a disability such as being blind or deaf, or suffer from a developmental disability or mental impairment. Those over 50 years old on the date of filing who have lived here for a total of at least 20 years after admission as a permanent resident and those who are over 55 and have been legal permanent residents for at least 15 years are also exempt from this requirement.
An applicant for naturalization must be admitted to the United States as a "lawful permanent resident" commonly referred to as one who possesses "green card" status. There is only one exception to this requirement: If an applicant has served in the U.S. armed forces during war, that person may be naturalized without first becoming a permanent resident if they were in the U.S. upon induction or enlistment into our military.
Were glad Trancredo has stepped up on an important issue.Press Releases :: September 13, 2007
Carlos Espinosa 202-225-7882; T.Q. Houlton 202-225-7882
Tancredo Calls for Hearings on Groups Aiding Illegal Aliens
Congressman says groups are violating federal law
( WASHINGTON, D.C. ) – Representative Tom Tancredo (R-Littleton) today sent a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.), asking him to hold oversight hearings to examine the increasing problem of private groups working openly to help illegal aliens escape prosecution. According to recent news reports, many groups (such as the ‘ Alliance to Develop Power’) routinely advise illegal aliens on how best to thwart immigration enforcement efforts.
“Groups like this one are openly defying the law, and that is unacceptable” Tancredo said. “The administration is failing to enforce the law, and Congress needs to take action.”
Tancredo cited Title 8, U.S. Code, Section 1324, which makes it illegal for any person to “encourage or induce an alien to…reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such…residence is or will be in violation of law.” Violations of the law are punishable by fines and prison time.
“When they assumed control of Congress, the Democrat leadership told us this Congress would take oversight seriously,” concluded Tancredo. “I hope they are willing to keep that promise and put their money where their mouth is.”
HOLD THEIR FEET TO THE FIRE.
Were so tired of Daley's Safe Sanctuary policy, and now we have an even better reason to be thouroughly disgusted. The city and business head tax couldn't get it right the first time. So Daley has a new SPIN PLAN, and is going to throw us to the wolves in sheep clothing. Why we need to seriously consider getting out of Chicago, a city that is cemented literally in corruption of greed and votes for continual power.
You have to love our Mayor! We have a budget crisis and now he wants the taxpayer to pay salaries of the non-English speakers, just so they can have jobs? That is, jobs taken from American citizens. Or is it an issue, AS AN American citizen but never bothering to even learn the English language? How are they to serve in their jobs, without the ability to communicate in English, with all the English speaking people whom they may end up serving, communicating or coming into contact with?
$2 million remains unspent. And the concept of head tax relief has been jettisoned entirely -- in favor of a redesigned initiative with a better chance of success.
The program still is aimed at helping businesses and the unemployed but now involves paying half an employee's wages for the first 12 weeks on the job -- with a cap of $3,500 -- and only after those candidates have been screened and trained by some of the 27 different agencies operating under the "Worknet Chicago" umbrella.
Fifty-seven candidates are now in a 12-week trial in jobs with benefits that pay at least $9 an hour. All have "significant barriers to employment" because they are ex-offenders, public-housing residents, homeless, residents of high-poverty areas, people with disabilities or non-English speakers.
********************************************************************Mayor least we remind you, this is a needed requirement for citizenship!
The ability to read, write and speak ordinary English unless they are physically unable to do so due to a disability such as being blind or deaf, or suffer from a developmental disability or mental impairment. Those over 50 years old on the date of filing who have lived here for a total of at least 20 years after admission as a permanent resident and those who are over 55 and have been legal permanent residents for at least 15 years are also exempt from this requirement.
An applicant for naturalization must be admitted to the United States as a "lawful permanent resident" commonly referred to as one who possesses "green card" status. There is only one exception to this requirement: If an applicant has served in the U.S. armed forces during war, that person may be naturalized without first becoming a permanent resident if they were in the U.S. upon induction or enlistment into our military.
Were glad Trancredo has stepped up on an important issue.Press Releases :: September 13, 2007
Carlos Espinosa 202-225-7882; T.Q. Houlton 202-225-7882
Tancredo Calls for Hearings on Groups Aiding Illegal Aliens
Congressman says groups are violating federal law
( WASHINGTON, D.C. ) – Representative Tom Tancredo (R-Littleton) today sent a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.), asking him to hold oversight hearings to examine the increasing problem of private groups working openly to help illegal aliens escape prosecution. According to recent news reports, many groups (such as the ‘ Alliance to Develop Power’) routinely advise illegal aliens on how best to thwart immigration enforcement efforts.
“Groups like this one are openly defying the law, and that is unacceptable” Tancredo said. “The administration is failing to enforce the law, and Congress needs to take action.”
Tancredo cited Title 8, U.S. Code, Section 1324, which makes it illegal for any person to “encourage or induce an alien to…reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such…residence is or will be in violation of law.” Violations of the law are punishable by fines and prison time.
“When they assumed control of Congress, the Democrat leadership told us this Congress would take oversight seriously,” concluded Tancredo. “I hope they are willing to keep that promise and put their money where their mouth is.”
HOLD THEIR FEET TO THE FIRE.
Tuesday, September 4, 2007
AMERICAN CITIZENS ARE TAKING THE STREETS BACK-OVER ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
Video
The Governments solution is to remain immobile and hog tied on the problem of illegal immigration. Police are locked up and bound up, elderly and women are being attacked, schools are over crowded, hospitals closing down and more illegal migration is occurring than legal migration. American Citizens are now headed to the streets. They demand to be heard and your being asked.
"How much more are you going to take?" How much more are Americans going to take?
"Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country. " sorce: Mexico's Constitution
President of Mexico Felipe Calderon blasted the United States for immigration policies that have divided families and slowed the amount of money sent home by Mexicans living north of the border.
He also reached out to the millions of Mexicans living in the United States, many illegally, saying: Mexico does not end at its borders. Where there is a Mexican, there is Mexico.
The Governments solution is to remain immobile and hog tied on the problem of illegal immigration. Police are locked up and bound up, elderly and women are being attacked, schools are over crowded, hospitals closing down and more illegal migration is occurring than legal migration. American Citizens are now headed to the streets. They demand to be heard and your being asked.
"How much more are you going to take?" How much more are Americans going to take?
"Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country. " sorce: Mexico's Constitution
President of Mexico Felipe Calderon blasted the United States for immigration policies that have divided families and slowed the amount of money sent home by Mexicans living north of the border.
He also reached out to the millions of Mexicans living in the United States, many illegally, saying: Mexico does not end at its borders. Where there is a Mexican, there is Mexico.
SOCIAL SECURITY NO-MATCH LETTERS AFL-CIO LAWSUIT-HOMELAND SECURITY
If its not Politicians or Corporations its Unions. The Homeland Security Safety recipe. For added extra flavor, just mix in a dash of ACLU and a cup of the Department of Labor with a sprinkle of Immigration Attorneys, baste Illegals and serve hot. Keep plenty of wipes on hand for this mess.
How Made In America Union Label has changed.
Unions and their profitable concubine membership with Illegal Aliens aided by the US Department of Labor mix.
Story Highlights
Government letters are to outline penalties for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants
Unions say letters violate workers' rights and unfairly burden employers
Judge will revisit case of the "no-match" letters October 1
U.S. District Judge Maxine Chesney granted a temporary restraining order prohibiting the so-called "no-match" letters from going out as planned starting Tuesday.
The AFL-CIO lawsuit, filed this week, claims that new Department of Homeland Security rules outlined in accompanying letters threaten to violate workers' rights and unfairly burden employers. Chesney said the court needs "breathing room" before making any decision on the legality of new penalties aimed at cracking down on the hiring of illegal immigrants.
The Social Security Administration has sent out "no-match" letters for more than two decades warning employers of discrepancies in the information the government has on their workers. Employers often brushed aside the letters, and the small fines that sometimes were incurred, as a cost of doing business.
But this year, those letters are to be accompanied by notices from the Department of Homeland Security outlining strict new requirements for employers to resolve those discrepancies within 90 days or face fines or criminal prosecution if they're deemed to have knowingly hired illegal immigrants.
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
ELVIRA ARELLANO OFFERED JOB IN MEXICO USA FOOLED
Uhhhhhhh why was she here again?
Just deported and already has a job, good ole Mexico, foolish US. Must be Mexico's own version of screw the US.
She's not sure if her son, Saul, will stay with her in Mexico or return to Chicago. So he is with her, interesting. She's saying its his choice to make, an 8 year old child, o.k. mom of the year. She goes on to say, "I will continue to tell him about the beauties of my country," she said. "He will know that he will have a marvelous future here." So why was she here again? Seems Elvira has had other choices all along, we already knew she had choices at home, like so many others who are still going to try and continue in making their demands on our soil. What a bite in the back side, huh? Were laughing hysterically at this big farce. A farce pulled over by mommy Elvira child separation plight, and her third world store front church of Chicago's own Safe Sanctuary haven of sob city catering.
All the pandering, marches, threats, demands and noise, all the tax payer financed aid. Along with her Chicago connections of supporting African American Reverends and Arse kissing Politicians, for what? Its clear, to turn the United States upside down, over and out. This article bakes the cake of duped fools. Poor, poor Elvira and her plight, huh?
Were taking time off from posting we deserve it. Especially after finally being able to produce Elvira's own we duped you words, on the big facade caper of crocodile tears.....
We need the break, good night....................................................
Saturday, August 4, 2007
Totalization Agreement with Mexico – U.S.-Mexican agreement, signed June 29, 2004
Social Security Administration (SSA) under the Freedom of Information Act. The cover letter from the SSA states that the agreement has not been “finalized.”
We suggest you read what Judicial Watch has obtained under FOIA very alarming. How often have you heard, your SS benefits may not be available for you when you retire or SS is broke? We have been duped by our own Governments love affair with Mexico's ill gotten gains. This may not have been finalized but how much has Mexico already profited from this fraud with the assist of our numerous sell out government officials? Were pawns for illegals profits and Mexico's benefit, and who is to blame and be held accountable? Their sitting in OUR Congress and Senate.
Friday, July 20, 2007
Million-Dollar Earmark To Nonexistent Organization Congress
This nonsense is costing us all an its not ceasing, John Murtha sneaks in an expensive earmark for a non-exist center, What on earth!
Earmark’s sponsor was Pennsylvania Representative John Murtha, who didn’t bother confirming whether the so-called Center for Instrumented Critical Infrastructure, actually exists, when he sneaked it into a bill sponsored by Indiana’s Peter Visclosky
In yet another example of the rampant waste and abuse with Congressional earmarks, a well-known Democratic lawmaker allocated $1 million taxpayer dollars to an organization that doesn’t even exist.
When a fellow House member, Arizona Republican Jeff Flake, questioned the suspicious earmark in his bill, Visclosky admitted that he didn’t have a clue. Flake specifically asked if the center about to receive $1 million taxpayer dollars currently exists and Visclosky said he did not know.
Lawmakers refused to strip the questionable earmark from the bill and proceeded to overwhelmingly pass it 312-112. Allocating money to entities without verifying that they exist seems to mark an all-time low for members of Congress,
In this case Congress earmarked an amount equal to about 40 years of salary for an average American family to an organization no one could certify as real.
Earmark’s sponsor was Pennsylvania Representative John Murtha, who didn’t bother confirming whether the so-called Center for Instrumented Critical Infrastructure, actually exists, when he sneaked it into a bill sponsored by Indiana’s Peter Visclosky
In yet another example of the rampant waste and abuse with Congressional earmarks, a well-known Democratic lawmaker allocated $1 million taxpayer dollars to an organization that doesn’t even exist.
When a fellow House member, Arizona Republican Jeff Flake, questioned the suspicious earmark in his bill, Visclosky admitted that he didn’t have a clue. Flake specifically asked if the center about to receive $1 million taxpayer dollars currently exists and Visclosky said he did not know.
Lawmakers refused to strip the questionable earmark from the bill and proceeded to overwhelmingly pass it 312-112. Allocating money to entities without verifying that they exist seems to mark an all-time low for members of Congress,
In this case Congress earmarked an amount equal to about 40 years of salary for an average American family to an organization no one could certify as real.
Saturday, June 23, 2007
DEPORT CONGRESS Muchos gracias
Thanks to Don Surber @ http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/2007/06/21/deport-congress/
This would be more cost effective and the background checks are already done.
A few weeks ago, a comment was left that said if we cannot deport 12 million illegal aliens, why not deport the 535 voting members of Congress?
That appears to be the mood of the public as well. A major pollster reported only 3% of the public are favorable to how Congress has handled illegal immigration.
To be sure, both sides of the Amnesty Bill are dissatisfied. However, Zogby International said only 38% favor Amnesty for illegal aliens.[A Gallup poll showed only 14% confidence in Congress. That puts Congress below HMOs. The military topped the list with 69% confidence, USA Today reported.]
Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit calls Deporting Congress,
"An immigration solution that might fly.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
