Showing posts with label Chicago Alderman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chicago Alderman. Show all posts

Monday, July 14, 2008

OBAMA DELIGHT OBMYUM NEW YORKER SHAKER JUICE




North Side South Side politics The Chicago Way.

Good Obama article by Ryan Lizza of the New Yorker tying in some of the many loose pieces from present to past. We envision tremendous grumblings coming out of the Obama dreamy coalition camp on this classic piece, great political artist may we add. So grab a deep cup and lets head on over and read about Obama's rise to fame drinking in swells of Chicago, Cook County, Illinois worth of
Obmyum juice, bump
.

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

MAYOR DALEY TELLS ALDERMEN TAKE CARE OF COMMUNITY VIOLENCE LAY OFF POLICE?

We have our bouts and retorts with Mayor Daley and when credit is due, we will also extend it. Mayor Daley you stepped up and recently supported the image of Chicago Police Officers and the unfairness of a few Aldermen towards our officers, thank you.

Since we don't want you thinking, we've fallen fast asleep Mayor Daley. While your on that roll in your efforts to defend and support us. How about taking on Al Sharpton who is also being supported by the Democrats, particularly Obama and Clinton? On that note, will you also rethink your Safe Sanctuary policies and free up our reins. Your stubborn stance, is actually harming the city and its citizens.

We will not forget the death or injury, to any fellow officer at the hands of either, criminal citizens or unknown illegal alien criminals. This issue is a serious bone of contention within the police community and it will not go silently away. Safe Sanctuary policies only perpetuate civil unrest and more crime, ultimately the citizens end up paying the price.

Saturday, October 20, 2007

CHICAGO ALDERMAN POLICE ARE GUILTY

Guilty stamped and delivered by Alderman using the media.

“Not giving out the names is an indication that you are trying to protect people who have committed crimes,” Smith said. Officer's deemed automatically guilty by Smith.

“I personally just want to know how many of them, if any of them, are in my police district and patrolling the streets in my ward. . . .Without that, we’re left in a blind spot,” Moore said. Same here.

Munoz added, “This is about transparency and accountability. Ninety-eight percent of the police officers are good police officers. It’s that two percent [who] are getting caught abusing their authority that we need to root out. The only way to do that effectively is to have all this information out.” Comment of transparency coming from you is a big laugh. Officer's on the list must be the 2% your referring to, you already deemed them automatically guilty.

Preckwinkle said it’s no surprise that 28 aldermen are prepared to force Daley’s hand. Not after a string of what she called “spectacular and disturbing cases” of alleged police misconduct and barroom brawls involving off-duty officers that hastened the retirement of Police Superintendent Phil Cline.
“It’s on people’s radar screens to an extent that it never was before,” she said.
Media has already tainted and influenced this alderman, Officer's must be guilty.

FOP President Donahue argued that many of the complaints are “just allegations.” But, once the names are released, the public will assume the worst, he said.

“The way the media has been covering these issues, the assumption will be that they’re guilty before they get a chance to prove that they’re not. The presumption of innocence will not exist for these officers,” he said.

What Donahue stated is true "releasing the names would not only be “totally unfair” to officers falsely accused. It would be unsafe" and the Aldermen yelling for the names along with their comments to the media show this to be a fact.